Skip to content

Introducing Perceptron Mk1.5

A New Layer of Intelligence for Embodied Agents

MOLMO2-TRACKF1HOTA0.000.250.500.751.00Mk1.50.6470.628MolmoPoint-8Bpaper0.6020.600Molmo2-8Bpaper0.5710.575Qwen3.8-27B0.5300.476Gemini 3.8 Flash0.5080.465Gemini 3.1 Pro0.5050.459Mk10.4820.396aQwen3.6-27B0.3970.345Gemini 3 Propaper0.3220.291Qwen3-VL-8Bpaper0.1800.165center-F1point-HOTAbold = best on this benchmark
Figure 2. Video tracking on four benchmarks. Solid bars are center-F1, light bars are point-HOTA; higher is better. Mk1.5 leads on Molmo2-Track, Ref-DAVIS17, and ReasonVOS. MolmoPoint-8B leads on MeViS valid_u. Models marked paper use published results.
BENCHMARKMk1.5Gemini3.1 ProGemini3.7 FlashGemini3.8 FlashΔ VS 3.1 PROΔ VS BEST GEMINIPERCEPTRON_EGO · HAND-LEVEL PERCEPTIONscore, 0 to 1hand_box0.94330.44670.59110.6179▲ +0.4966 (+111%)▲ +0.3254 (+53%)subtask0.63310.60560.60150.6253▲ +0.0275 (+5%)▲ +0.0078 (+1%)hand_action_verb0.27520.31370.34260.3026▼ -0.0385 (-12%)▼ -0.0673 (-20%)hand_caption0.54350.45020.52110.4944▲ +0.0933 (+21%)▲ +0.0224 (+4%)EGOSCHEMA · LONG-FORM VIDEO QAaccuracy, %egoschema80.4078.0080.0081.20▲ +2.40 (+3%)▼ -0.80 (-1%)egoschema_hard63.7555.6256.8856.25▲ +8.13 (+15%)▲ +6.87 (+12%)bars start at 0 · bold = best in row▲ Mk1.5 leads▼ Mk1.5 trails
Figure 3. Egocentric perception and long-form video QA. hand_box is scored by centroid box overlap fraction; subtask, hand_action_verb and hand_caption by permissible subsegment Jaccard with a Gemini 2.5 Pro judge; EgoSchema by multiple-choice exact match. Bold marks the best model in each row. Deltas are absolute differences (percentage points for EgoSchema) with the relative change in brackets. Best Gemini is chosen per row.
MODELDAILYOMNI ↑WORLDSENSE ↑OMNIBENCH ↑AVHBENCH ↑Mk1.574.6750.3251.0580.56AV-Flamingo Instruct72.40[1]50.30[1]48.50[1]≈79.74c[1]AV-Flamingo Think73.90[1]51.60[1]50.60[1]≈83.61c[1]Qwen2.5-Omni-7B62.07[12]45.40[13]56.13[4]–Qwen3-Omni-30B-A3B Instruct71.85[12]54.00[13]––Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus84.68a[12]62.80[13]––Qwen3.5-Omni-Flash81.80[3]57.90[3]––Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview82.79[12]65.50[13]––Gemini 2.5 Pro–65.10b[13]––Mk1.5reportedderived estimatebars start at 0 · bold = highest in column · – = not reported
Figure 4. Audio-visual understanding. Accuracy in %, higher is better. A dash means no reported result. Outlined bars are derived estimates. Bold marks the highest number in each column.a DailyOmni: Qwen3.5-Omni-Plus's 84.68 excludes 22 failed requests (1,175 valid / 1,197 total). Counting those failures as incorrect gives approximately 83.12.b WorldSense: Gemini 2.5 Pro's score uses adaptive thinking.c AVHBench: AV-Flamingo pooled scores are derived estimates, not separately published results. They assume 1,136 audio→visual and 2,290 visual→audio questions, matching our N = 3,426.
LiveVQA-W
Visual questions on recent news, videos and papers. Overall accuracy, %, higher is better.
SYSTEMOVERALL ACCURACY, % ↑0102030405060Mk1.54 samples, majority vote56.0Gemini 3.8 Flash+ Google Search grounding53.2GPT-6 sol+ OpenAI web search51.0GPT-5.2 onlinereported, 3-run mean33.2
Overall is the mean of the benchmark's two levels. Mk1.5, Gemini 3.8 Flash and GPT-6 sol were measured by us; GPT-5.2 online is a reported 3-run mean.
MK1.5 VS MK1 · END-TO-END LATENCY
Up to 4.7× faster, end to end
Median time from request to complete answer, lower is better.
4.7×faster5.2 s1.1 sChat1 user3.3×faster1.7 s0.51 sImage Q&A1 user2.1×faster19 s9.1 s60 s video8 at once
Mk1Mk1.5bars scaled within each workload
End-to-end latency: request sent to last token received, median of 3 runs · 1× H100 · Bars scaled within each workload; labels are measured values. Chat: LMArena single-turn prompts, answers ≤256 tokens · Image Q&A: MIA-Bench · Video: Video-MME + Perception Test.
Mk1.5 on video understanding
Accuracy, %, higher is better. A dash means no reported result.
BENCHMARKPerceptronMk1.5AlibabaQwen3.5-27BOpenAIGPT-5AnthropicSonnet 4.5Google Gemini3.1 Flash-LiteGoogle Gemini3.1 ProHARD SUBSETEgoSchema61.341.4––25.040.6NExT-QA64.253.3––45.555.0VSI-Bench85.483.3––68.172.9STANDARDPerception Test67.677.679.464.369.184.1MVBench73.473.674.162.163.677.3NExT-QA85.686.086.379.274.684.8TempCompass78.079.680.472.880.588.2
Comparison scores are from Perceptron's published video benchmark table. Mk1.5 scores are rounded to one decimal. Bold marks the best in each row.

Mk1.5 is available via the Perceptron Platform and our updated SDK.

Context Window: 32K tokens of multimodal context

API Model ID: perceptron-mk1.5

Pricing: $0.15/M input tokens | $1.50/M output tokens

Context Window: 32K tokens of multimodal context

API Model ID: perceptron-mk1.5

Pricing: $0.15/M input tokens | $1.50/M output tokens

Context Window: 32K tokens of multimodal context

API Model ID: perceptron-mk1.5

Pricing: $0.15/M input tokens | $1.50/M output tokens

If you'd like to learn more about deploying Mk1.5 on your infrastructure, please reach out to sales@perceptron.inc.